Відео

Very flawed but visually striking and intense. I've always liked it from when I was a kid, but I understand how the fate of Newt and Hicks poisoned it for many fans of the series. Lance is right, Fincher's nihilism got away from him on this one (though my favorite Fincher film is still Seven, so go figure).

I'll be fair and say there was some good acting and powerful music in this turd but the rest was pure shit.

Original is more terrifying.

I feel the same on hangover.

That team would have been a winner.

The voice sounds something like the Chromite in "The Mice" in 1960s "The Outer Limits"

The old one sounds more like the actual engineers in Prometheus - it would help match things up better to use the original.

At least The Colonial Marines saved Hicks. So... at least he survived.

"Here's a picture of 'im and he died."

The vocals kick ass!

Soo, what version is this one? ua-cam.com/video/AvUbqY1S-QQ/v-deo.html

It's a very good dystopian sci-fi movie, but was disappointing as an Alien movie (for most audiences).

The last guy hit the nail on the head with his comment. I've always said myself as an end to the trilogy I hate it, but if you look at it as a stand alone film, it was really good. Man if Fincher was a more seasoned director instead of brand new like he was in 92, imagine what could have been...

Alien 3 was well filmed but it was the biggest wet blanket when they killed off Newt who had survived weeks without adult supervision... and Hicks who backed Ripley whole heartedly...Just pure crapola...I have read many reviews of Alien 3 which had many scripts and rewrites. It was the victim of movie by committee... members of a board who do not know movie making. Scott and Cameron had screen plays for Alien 3 and 4 and needed 30 million $ to make them happen... they would swap off as Director and Producer for each and complete the saga... Fox said thats too much money... yet they spent $50 million on the crapfest of Alien 3...it didn't break even in the states. We had to write a sequel to a movie for Creative Writing class so I rewrote ALIEN 3 and hicks and newt survive... In my story the queen has 2 face huggers attached to her like a wolf spider... they attach themselves to coils in the dropship. Another company intercepts the distress call from Hadleys Hope and dispatches a ship to investigate... They track the Sulaco, board her in hopes of finding something of value... they take samples of the blood on on the deck of the landing area and search the dropship where one of them is attacked by a face hugger... and then the second...which is a queen specimen... They jettison the drop ship with the two victims aboard in orbit of a planet recently colonized for mining. One of the corp types jettisons the survivors of Aliens in the escape pods in order to save them from their boss... The sulaco is destroyed to cover the events of the boarding and everyone ends up on the planet, where some semi hospitable colonists receive them... and they all have to deal with the xenomorphs... one being a queen...(I also posit the possibility for a host to have more than one chest buster...so twins which puts a twist Fortunately, they have mining lasers for defense this time as they scramble to find the queen before she begins laying eggs...

The 79 version sounds like a voice. The 03 is more like a sound.

I think The Prodigy sampled the 1979 one on Skylined?

Back when I was a kid playing this game, this is exactly where it took my mind. All these modern Renditions are so nostalgic

That’s not what happened to Hicks. He survived cause the Sulaco was intercepted his so called body was replaced before the events of Alien 3 took place and the game Aliens: Colonial Marines explains this a much better alternative to Alien 3 I think.

2:07 "Doom Guy kicks Hell Knight in the Nuts at Birthday Party" ((May 5th 2024 -- COLORIZED))

Imagine if you showed this to the world in 1994. The world would collectively shit their pants

Geez, you guys are just "mixing" every single graphics details to this game.

I agree. It angered and surprised me to see Hicks just disappear VIA being killed off. That was a huge mistake.

Interesting departure from the original level design.

It is anti holly wood,❤

jesus christ, it's a Bloodbath

what kind of doom is this

Different doesn't make it bad

Terrible sequel to Aliens

Maybe the first two were better? LOL

Alien: 9/10 Aliens (Special): 10/10 Alien 3 (Assembly): 8/10 (Rest don’t exist, under 6/10) Alien 3 is so underrated. The franchise is supposed to be bleak and depressing, but Alien 3 does that the most. If people want to see more of Hicks and Newt, read the fucking Alien 3 book or rewatch Aliens.

What is the name of the song?

Alot of mistakes, but Fincher did the best he could. Hollywood exec producers interferred far too dam much. Leave them to make the film! Typical Hollywood! Great British cast all filmed in the UK, the home of filmmaking of the world.

Man, the opening was dark

Loved it from Day 1. EVERYONE wanted to see Aliens II. So they savaged it when it wasn't that. But what it was? Was excellent.

Hack writers ruined this franchise, starting with this crap.

No doubt original is the best!

Unpopular opinion but while killing off two major characters offscreen is always lazy but their death fit very well within the harsh reality of the alien world and they died just simply in an accident, not undermining their characters (like Shaw being stupid enough to become an incubator toy for crazy synth who just killed her boyfriend) . I always liked their deaths it set the tone for the movie and for Ripley's sacrafice.

The original is more scary sounding ancient war cry....

I liked the second one better.

79 is best.❤

@1:37 I always wondered when hicks got a prosthetic arm. I remember seeing his elbow when I was younger and was perplexed..... 🤣🤣

Hicks was a GREAT Character. He was a MAN! Killing him & Newt off-camera was weak and making Bishop evil destroyed Aliens.

He is correct that the characters had so much potential. Whoever made the decision to remove Hicks, and even Newt after all of the development that went into them and the arch that they were helping the Ripley character take, that person is responsible for an unmistakable failure no matter which way you cut.

Alien3 is just as good as the first two entries. The 4th one sucked.

The studio gave the director all kinds of problems with this movie.

Third one was boring

I love Alien 3

The music... is creepy.

Hicks was the best character in the franchise! Followed by Vasquez! Stupid that they went with the dumbest movie script imaginable for Alien 3

Michael Biehn (Hicks) later said that he was hurt about how his character was killed off, and how he didn't have any input to the story arch. Tough to provide input when you weren't even considered to reprise your role. But he was fantastic as Hicks in Aliens, amazing in Terminator, and had some other small (but great) roles in The Rock and The Abyss. Alien 3 was a weird film to watch, taking a darker turn. Then again, it was directed by David Fincher, who has that kind of director style anyway. Alien Resurrection was an ill-fated attempt to regain the franchise's popularity but it was a horrible movie, honestly. You can't go from James Cameron to these other directors and expect the same success. Again, poor Hicks and Newt, they deserved better.